Sciences and religions in the late modern period

Introduction

The overarching conflicts and modes of accommodation with Charles Darwin[1]'s theories in France and the United Kingdom have been developed in the previous chapter. Father Alexander Torrend echoed them when writing that Darwin admitted of God as creator and declared his belief in the immortality of the soul. For this, the Jesuit wanted no other proof than the considerations Darwin gave to the thoughts primitive humans may have countenanced about divine existence: “It is obvious, wrote Fr. Torrend, that he who considers human biological progress from an animal state has to wonder how to conciliate this viewpoint with the immortality of the soul. But where is the necessity for us to know at which point in its life the soul becomes immortal and whether this happens before or after birth?” In his view, it is not possible for men to establish the time species evolved from one stratum to the next. He infers from this the existence in people's lives of many phenomena the mysteries of which are resistant to our understanding, and the impossibility for the mind to measure their relation to the impact of blind primeval force. Hence the “Creator” has a part to play in the different stages of human life and it is from the “Almighty” that the human soul receives its immortality even if no one knows at which stage in their life children receive an “immortal soul”. He held that Darwin, towards the end of his life, confirmed his belief in the existence of God and in the immortality of the soul and that he did not lean towards materialist doctrines. While deploying his views on the transformations and progress of species, he merely indicated that humans originated from the ape genus. Follows a presentation of responses to the Darwinists' main contentions, which seem essentially received through a prejudiced reading of Ernest Haeckel[2]'s works.

  1. Charles Darwin (1809-1882):

    Born in a family where industrial and academic traditions merged, Darwin first studied Medicine at Edinburgh University before starting a Arts degree at Christ's College Cambridge. His averred interest in and commitment to the natural sciences earned him a place on HMS Beagle for an around the world scientific expedition (1831-1836), when he trained on the spot through extensive naturalist observation and collecting while deepening his scientific reading thanks to the ship's library. Upon his return, he published his first scientific research and was, as from 1837, pondering the “transmutation” of species. After a long developmental phase, he published On the Origin of Species On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Immediately popular, the book was promptly translated in many languages. The theory it proposed gradually imposed evolutionism in scientific circles although natural selection, the mechanism suggested by Darwin, was disputed. In broader civil society the book was highly contentious.

  2. Ernest Haeckel (1834-1919):

    German zoologist who studied under J. Müller. Although trained as a physician (thesis in Vienna in 1857), Haeckel abandoned his practice in 1859 after reading Darwin's On the Origin of Species. He became interested in anatomy and comparative embryology and studied under Carl Gegenbauer in Jena for three years before becoming a professor of comparative anatomy in 1862. Between 1859 and 1866, he worked on many "invertebrate" groups, including radiolarians, poriferans (sponges) and annelids (segmented worms). He named nearly 150 new species of radiolarians during a trip to the Mediterranean.

    "Invertebrates" provided the fodder for most of his experimental work on development, leading to his "law of recapitulation". Haeckel postulated the existence of a "gastraea"—an organism that resembled the gastrula and was, by extension, the ancestor of all the vertebrates.

    He was the leading populariser of Darwinian evolustionist theories in Germany and Europe notably with his Natürlichen Schöpfungsgeschichte (The History of Creation, 1868) and Anthropogeny, 1874. He promoted a form of monism which some assimilated to materialism. Haeckel's speculative ideas and possible fudging of data, plus lack of empirical support for many of his ideas, tarnished his scientific credentials.

PrécédentPrécédentSuivantSuivant
AccueilAccueilImprimerImprimer Overall coordination by Dominique Avon Professor at the Université du Maine (France) Paternité - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de ModificationRéalisé avec Scenari (nouvelle fenêtre)