The dynasty, the aristocracy and the peasantry
The Shihabs sat at the top of the social ladder. They assumed the title of prince (emir) to be used for all members of the family. The ruling emir took on the title of « ruling prince-emir »
. In second place came the Arslan[1] and Abil Lama[2] emirs. Those would, like the Shihabs, embrace Christianity in the 18th century and would alone be able to marry in that family. Below them came the families of sheikhs, ranking as « great »
or « little »
. These families allowed intermarriage according to specific conventions. In this stratified society, rank was narrowly observed. The respect owed a person did not lessen if they became poor, or increase if they grew rich. Aristocratic alliances were made and unmade on the basis of political interests but not religious faith. Still, there was an inbuilt polarization wherein Quaysites and Yemenites would be replaced in due course by Jumblatti[3] and Yazbaki[4] after 1750. The Christians joined one or the other of these parties. Each aristocratic family ruled over one or several districts, with the title of muqata'ji; the territory under their responsibility was called a muqataat. The muqata'ji fulfilled at least 5 functions:
Protection/living wage: the muquata'ji must ensure the peasant farmers placed in his care had the means to survive by giving them work on their land, usually through tenancy or sharecropping. He answered for their safety and that of their property.
Fiscal: he collected taxes in his district, sometimes contributing himself, to a lesser extent, and retained the monies necessary to his local administration.
Judicial: he judged the offences committed by his subjects but criminal offences were referred to the prince-emir's court.
Military: he retained a militia for the emir to dispose of whether to maintain internal order or to settle potential differences with the Turkish Pashas[5].
Elective: he, along with his peers would be party to the election of the emir. Such an election was carried out through consultation rather than ballot; it nevertheless mitigated the emirship's hereditary aspect and gave it a dimension not to be found in Ottoman institutions.
The other social category, made up with peasant farmers was subservient to the first. The peasant-lord relationship was not based on confessional obedience, it did not entail any investiture rite or oath of loyalty. Most Christians in mixed districts swore allegiance to Druze[6] Muqata'ji and they depended on them in no small number for their upkeep. There were two types of peasant farmers: those, independent, who owned their own land and the land-less who tried to acquire it through their work as set out according to the different types of tenancy. The distinctiveness of the iqta versus other socio-political systems extant in the Ottoman Empire notwithstanding, the peasant farmer was subjected to the miri[7] owed to the sultan. The prince-emir secured his peers' allegiance, paid up the taxes and took up the mantle, insignia of his leadership.