Introduction
Jewish mysticism is studied principally within two domains of research: Jewish studies, and the study of esotericism. While the writings of Gershom Scholem[1] - founder and first Chair in the study of Jewish mysticism in Jerusalem in the 1930's – endorse the expression 'Jewish mysticism' in speaking of the kabbalah , studies in the history of esotericism consider it to be the 'esotericism' or the 'esoteric tradition' of Judaism par excellence , establishing a distinction – albeit unclear – between esotericism and mysticism. Antoine Faivre's terminology in relation to the kabbalah appears all the more vague when it refers to the Zohar[2] , “the summit of Jewish theosophy[3] ” . From the point of view of forging a disciplinary field covering the 'study of western esotericism', a relatively recent creation, it should perhaps be seen here as a desire to integrate under a new label without religious differentiation what had up until then been loosely labelled as 'Jewish mysticism'.
A comparison of the meaning encapsulated by Antoine Faivre in his definition of esotericism and mysticism on the one hand and the meaning Scholem gave to the term mysticism on the other reveals an important divergence in the treatment of the subject. Motivated by a desire to provide an operational definition of esotericism, Antoine Faivre tends to draw a distinction between mysticism on one side and esotericism – or 'gnosis[4] ' – on the other .
According to Faivre, what distinguishes mysticism from esotericism is the capacity of the individual to communicate their experience in terms that are comprehensible to others. Implicitly, he is making reference to the ineffable character of the mystical experience, often presented as an important characteristic of the experience of mysticism. We should bear in mind this notion of the ineffability of mystical experience when we come across it again, in an original form, in Scholem's conception of Jewish mysticism.
Reading the works of Antoine Faivre reveals the difficulty of clearly distinguishing a group of concepts relating to esotericism, defined in the course of history by terms such as 'hermetism[5]' , 'theosophy', 'alchemy[6]' etc. It is the reason why Faivre formulated a 'criteriology' intended to identify the presence of a 'form of esotericism' . Four criteria must be present:
the existence of correspondence between all the elements of the universe;
the perception of nature as a living and animated whole;
the presence of the imagination, the faculty of the soul which enables it to decipher the mysteries of living nature, using different mediators to do so (symbols, intermediary spirits etc);
the experience of transmutation – a term borrowed from alchemy: man, through his knowledge of the secret reality of the universe, is profoundly transformed. To these four essential components are added two secondary ones, often present in the form of esoteric thought, but not indispensable;
the practice of concordance with philosophical and religious traditions;
the recognition of a transmission which alone can validate the knowledge received and the transmutation which follows.